{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Sheet1"],"read":"whole","date_system":"1904","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":0,"n_rows":10,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":10,"merged":[[3,1,4,1],[3,2,3,4],[3,5,3,7],[3,8,3,10],[9,1,11,10]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[]
[]
[null,"Table S5. Performance under variable sequencing error rates"]
[null,null,"e ≈ Perra",null,null,"e >> Perr",null,null,"e << Perr"]
[null,null,"FNRb","FPRc","FDRd","FNR","FPR","FDR","FNR","FPR","FDR"]
[null,"ALL",0.1842,"1.0x10-5",0.0078,0.7626,0,0,0.1663,"3.0x10-5",0.0247]
[null,"UNI",0.2422,0,0.0012,0.8232,0,0,0.2194,"1.0x10-5",0.0079]
[null,"BEST",0.1807,"7.0x10-5",0.0572,0.8064,0,0,0.1665,"1.4x10-4",0.1102]
[]
[null,"ae denotes the expected global sequencing error rate parameter. Perr denotes the true sequencing error rate of the experiment. bFalse negative rate; cFalse positive rate; dFalse discovery rate. Estimates were computed as the average across 5 replicate sequencing simulations generating 50-fold coverage of the 2x RPL +5% simulated template and averaging over stringency, 40 ≤ Q ≤ 90. k = 1 for ALL, UNI, and BEST. e was set either 10-fold lower than Perr (column 2) or 10-fold higher (column 3)."]