{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":3,"sheets":["1.1_Pathway_Maps_analysis","1.2_Network_analysis","1.3_Network_analysis"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":5},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"1.1_Pathway_Maps_analysis","index":0,"n_rows":45,"n_cols":22,"rows_kept":45,"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["Enrichment analysis report"]
["Enrichment by Pathway Maps",{"$nulls":4},"R_Nymph",{"$nulls":3},"S_Nymph",{"$nulls":3},"R_Larvae",{"$nulls":3},"S_Larve",{"$nulls":3},""]
["#","Maps","Total","min(pValue)","Min FDR","p-value","FDR","In Data","Network Objects from\nActive Data","p-value","FDR","In Data","Network Objects from\nActive Data","p-value","FDR","In Data","Network Objects from\nActive Data","p-value","FDR","In Data","Network Objects from\nActive Data",""]
[1,"Role of fibroblasts and keratinocytes in the elicitation phase of allergic contact dermatitis",26,{"v":2.0952402216912e-07,"d":"2.095E-07"},{"v":1.96952580838973e-05,"d":"1.970E-05"},{"v":2.0952402216912e-07,"d":"2.095E-07"},{"v":1.96952580838973e-05,"d":"1.970E-05"},3,"IL-8, CCL2, GRO-2",{"v":2.0952402216912e-07,"d":"2.095E-07"},{"v":1.96952580838973e-05,"d":"1.970E-05"},3,"IL-8, CCL2, GRO-2",{"v":2.0952402216912e-07,"d":"2.095E-07"},{"v":1.96952580838973e-05,"d":"1.970E-05"},3,"IL-8, CCL2, GRO-2",{"v":4.7423197400914404e-05,"d":"4.742E-05"},{"v":0.000810476000511262,"d":"8.105E-04"},2,"IL-8, GRO-2"]
["Info"]
["General"]
["Date","2014-04-16"]
["Server","portal.genego.com"]
["Version","6.17.64668"]
["Name","University of Sao Paulo - Isabel Santos named seat"]
["Login","usp16"]
[""]
["Workflow Settings"]
["Type","Enrichment analysis"]
["Signals","both"]
[""]
["Active Data"]
["Name","Type","Size","","Threshold",0]
["Table 1; S_Larvae","General",4,"","P-value",0.05]
["Table 1; R_Larvae","General",5]
["Table 1; R_Nymph","General",5]
["Table 1; S_Nymph","General",5]
[]
[]
["Enrichment Analysis Workflow 1.0 Data Analysis Report"]
["Server:",null,"portal.genego.com"]
["Date:",null,"2014‑04‑16"]
["Name:",null,"University of Sao Paulo ‑ Isabel Santos named seat"]
["Login:",null,"usp16"]
[]
["Experiments"]
[]
[" 1."," ","R_Nymph"]
[" 2."," ","S_Nymph"]
[" 3."," ","S_Larvae"]
[" 4."," ","R_Larvae"]
[]
["The experiments uploaded for comparative analysis"]
[]
["#","Processes","%","p-Value"]
[1,"inflammatory response","12.60",{"v":4.444e-53,"d":"4.44E-53"}]
[2,"chemotaxis","8.49",{"v":4.277e-42,"d":"4.28E-42"}]
[3,"immune response","10.41",{"v":1.414e-39,"d":"1.41E-39"}]
[4,"chemokine-mediated signaling pathway","5.21",{"v":4.437e-32,"d":"4.44E-32"}]
[5,"neutrophil chemotaxis","4.66",{"v":3.105e-25,"d":"3.11E-25"}]

{"sheet":"1.2_Network_analysis","index":1,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":19,"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["Analyze network Workflow Report"]
["Server:","portal.genego.com"]
["Date:","2014‑04‑28"]
["Name:","University of Sao Paulo ‑ Isabel Santos named seat"]
["Login:","usp16"]
["Experiments"]
[]
[" 1.","Table 2; R_Larvae"]
[" 2.","Table 2; R_Nymph"]
[]
["Selected networks built from active experiments"]
["Network 1"]
["Network 2"]
["Network 3"]
[]
["No","Key network objects","GO Processes","Total nodes","Seed nodes","Pathways","p‑Value","zScore","gScore"]
[1,"AP‑1, c‑Jun, HMGB1, PKR, ISG15","MyD88‑dependent toll‑like receptor signaling pathway (58.3%), toll‑like receptor TLR6:TLR2 signaling pathway (56.2%), toll‑like receptor TLR1:TLR2 signaling pathway (56.2%), toll‑like receptor 2 signaling pathway (56.2%), toll‑like receptor 4 signaling pathway (56.2%)",50,5,1021,"7.44e‑13","  46.29","1322.54"]
[2,"AP‑1, PDK (PDPK1), HMGB1, Tob1, Secretogranin II","toll‑like receptor 10 signaling pathway (40.0%), toll‑like receptor 5 signaling pathway (40.0%), toll‑like receptor TLR6:TLR2 signaling pathway (40.0%), toll‑like receptor TLR1:TLR2 signaling pathway (40.0%), toll‑like receptor 9 signaling pathway (40.0%)",50,6,0,"1.04e‑15","  55.01","  55.01"]
[3,"AP‑1, HMGB1, AKR1C2, Cathepsin D, ERK1 (MAPK3)","cellular response to organic substance (82.0%), response to oxygen‑containing compound (78.0%), enzyme linked receptor protein signaling pathway (62.0%), response to organic substance (88.0%), cellular response to growth factor stimulus (56.0%)",50,5,0,"7.44e‑13","  46.29","  46.29"]

{"sheet":"1.3_Network_analysis","index":2,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":14,"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["Analyze network Workflow Report"]
["Server:","portal.genego.com"]
["Date:","2014‑04‑28"]
["Name:","University of Sao Paulo ‑ Isabel Santos named seat"]
["Login:","usp16"]
["Experiments"]
[]
[" 1.","Table 2; R_Larvae"]
[" 2.","Table 2; R_Nymph"]
[]
["Selected network built from active experiments"]
[]
["No","Key network objects","GO Processes","Total nodes","Seed nodes","Pathways","p‑Value","zScore","gScore"]
[1,"AL1A1, NAD('+) + H(,2)O + Aldehyde = Fatty acids + NADH, (S)‑Lactaldehyde + NADH = Propylene glycol + NAD('+), NAD('+) + Heptanal + H(,2)O = Heptanoic acid + NADH, Propylene glycol intracellular","9‑cis‑retinoic acid biosynthetic process (100.0%), 9‑cis‑retinoic acid metabolic process (100.0%), retinoic acid biosynthetic process (100.0%), diterpenoid biosynthetic process (100.0%), optic cup morphogenesis involved in camera‑type eye development (100.0%)",19,1,0,"9.77e‑05"," 101.18"," 101.18"]