Adler, S. A., & Gallego, P. (2014). Search asymmetry and eye movements in infants and adults.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
76(6), 1590–1608.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0667-6
Anderson, G. M., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). Top-down expectancy versus bottom-up guidance in search for known color-form conjunctions.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77(8), 2622–2639.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0960-z
Azizi, E., Abel, L. A., & Stainer, M. J. (2017). The influence of action video game playing on eye movement behaviour during visual search in abstract, in-game and natural scenes.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
79(2), 484–497.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1256-7
Barrett, D. J. K., & Zobay, O. (2020). Concurrent evaluation of independently cued features during perceptual decisions and saccadic targeting in visual search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(3), 966–984.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01854-w
Brams, S., Ziv, G., Hooge, I. T. C., Levin, O., De Brouwere, T., Verschakelen, J., Dauwe, S., Williams, A. M., Wagemans, J., & Helsen, W. F. (2020). Focal lung pathology detection in radiology:
Is there an effect of experience on visual search behavior?
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(6), 2837–2850.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02033-y
Casteau, S., & Smith, D. T. (2020). On the link between attentional search and the oculomotor system:
Is preattentive search restricted to the range of eye movements?
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(2), 518–532.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01949-4
Chabal, S., Schroeder, S. R., & Marian, V. (2015). Audio-visual object search is changed by bilingual experience.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77(8), 2684–2693.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0973-7
Chetverikov, A., Kuvaldina, M., MacInnes, W. J., Jóhannesson, Ó. I., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018). Implicit processing during change blindness revealed with mouse-contingent and gaze-contingent displays.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
80(4), 844–859.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1468-5
Christie, G. J., Spalek, T. M., & McDonald, J. J. (2018). Salience drives overt selection of two equally relevant visual targets.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
80(6), 1342–1349.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1555-2
Couperus, J. W., & Quirk, C. (2015). Visual search and the
N2pc in children.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77(3), 768–776.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0833-5
Decroix, J., & Kalénine, S. (2019). What first drives visual attention during the recognition of object-directed actions?
The role of kinematics and goal information.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
81(7), 2400–2409.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01784-7
Draschkow, D., & Võ, M. L.-H. (2016). Of
“what” and
“where” in a natural search task:
Active object handling supports object location memory beyond the object’s identity.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
78(6), 1574–1584.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1111-x
Eymond, C., Cavanagh, P., & Collins, T. (2019). Feature-based attention across saccades:
Pop-out in color search is spatiotopic.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
81(1), 85–97.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1597-5
Fabius, J. H., Schut, M. J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2016). Spatial inhibition of return as a function of fixation history, task, and spatial references.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
78(6), 1633–1641.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1123-6
Finlayson, N. J., & Grove, P. M. (2015). Visual search is influenced by
3D spatial layout.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77(7), 2322–2330.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0924-3
Gao, Y.-Y., Schneider, B., & Li, L. (2017). The effects of the binocular disparity differences between targets and maskers on visual search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
79(2), 459–472.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1252-y
Grossberg, S. (2019). The resonant brain:
How attentive conscious seeing regulates action sequences that interact with attentive cognitive learning, recognition, and prediction.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
81(7), 2237–2264.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01789-2
Hannus, A., Bekkering, H., & Cornelissen, F. W. (2020). Preview of partial stimulus information in search prioritizes features and conjunctions, not locations.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(1), 140–152.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01841-1
Higuchi, Y., Inoue, S., Endo, T., & Kumada, T. (2019). Task-irrelevant optic flow guides attention in visual search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
81(5), 1327–1345.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-01646-8
Hilchey, M. D., Leber, A. B., & Pratt, J. (2018). Testing the role of response repetition in spatial priming in visual search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
80(6), 1362–1374.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1550-7
Hollingworth, A., & Matsukura, M. (2019). Feature-based guidance of attention during post-saccadic selection.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
81(6), 1822–1835.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01719-2
Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2015). Target templates: The precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77(1), 128–149.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6
Hout, M. C., Robbins, A., Godwin, H. J., Fitzsimmons, G., & Scarince, C. (2017). Categorical templates are more useful when features are consistent:
Evidence from eye movements during search for societally important vehicles.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
79(6), 1578–1592.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1354-1
Hulleman, J., Lund, K., & Skarratt, P. A. (2020). Medium versus difficult visual search:
How a quantitative change in the functional visual field leads to a qualitative difference in performance.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(1), 118–139.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01787-4
Kruijne, W., & Meeter, M. (2016). Implicit short- and long-term memory direct our gaze in visual search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
78(3), 761–773.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1021-3
Lewis, J. E., & Neider, M. B. (2015). Fixation
Not Required:
Characterizing Oculomotor Attention Capture for
Looming Stimuli.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77(7), 2247–2259.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0950-1
Lin, Z., Lu, Z.-L., & He, S. (2016). Decomposing experience-driven attention:
Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
78(7), 2185–2198.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1101-z
Lleras, A., Wang, Z., Ng, G. J. P., Ballew, K., Xu, J., & Buetti, S. (2020). A target contrast signal theory of parallel processing in goal-directed search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(2), 394–425.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01928-9
MacInnes, W. J., Hunt, A. R., Hilchey, M. D., & Klein, R. M. (2014). Driving forces in free visual search:
An ethology.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
76(2), 280–295.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0608-9
Maturi, K. S., & Sheridan, H. (2020). Expertise effects on attention and eye-movement control during visual search:
Evidence from the domain of music reading.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(5), 2201–2208.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-01979-3
Mayer, K. M., Thornton, I. M., & Vuong, Q. C. (2020). Comparable search efficiency for human and animal targets in the context of natural scenes.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(3), 954–965.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01901-6
Meghanathan, R. N., Nikolaev, A. R., & Leeuwen, C. van. (2019). Refixation patterns reveal memory-encoding strategies in free viewing.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
81(7), 2499–2516.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01735-2
Mine, C., & Saiki, J. (2018). Pavlovian reward learning elicits attentional capture by reward-associated stimuli.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
80(5), 1083–1095.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1502-2
Morgan, M. J., & Solomon, J. A. (2020). A visual search asymmetry for relative novelty in the visual field based on sensory adaptation.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(3), 938–943.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01943-w
Ng, G. J. P., Lleras, A., & Buetti, S. (2018). Fixed-target efficient search has logarithmic efficiency with and without eye movements.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
80(7), 1752–1762.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1561-4
Niimi, R. (2020). Interacting hands draw attention during scene observation.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(3), 1088–1098.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01881-7
Nissens, T., & Fiehler, K. (2020). The attractiveness of salient distractors to reaching movements is task dependent.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(5), 2502–2515.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-01984-6
Proctor, R. W., & Healy, A. F. (2020). Visual selection and response selection without effector selection in tasks with circular arrays.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02116-w
Ratiu, I., Hout, M. C., Walenchok, S. C., Azuma, T., & Goldinger, S. D. (2017). Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
79(6), 1695–1725.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1328-3
Retell, J. D., Venini, D., & Becker, S. I. (2015). Oculomotor
Capture by
New and
Unannounced Color Singletons during
Visual Search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
77(5), 1529–1543.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0888-3
Smith, M. K., & Grabowecky, M. (2020). Exogenous
Orientation of
Attention to the
Center of
Mass in a
Visual Search Task.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(2), 729–738.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01908-z
Solman, G. J. F., Hickey, K., & Smilek, D. (2014). Comparing target detection errors in visual search and manually-assisted search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
76(4), 945–958.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0641-3
Stefani, M., Sauter, M., & Mack, W. (2020). Delayed disengagement from irrelevant fixation items:
Is it generally functional?
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(2), 637–654.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01926-x
Verghese, A., Mattingley, J. B., Palmer, P. E., & Dux, P. E. (2018). From eyes to hands:
Transfer of learning in the
Simon task across motor effectors.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
80(1), 193–210.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1427-1
Walenchok, S. C., Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2016). Implicit object naming in visual search:
Evidence from phonological competition.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
78(8), 2633–2654.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1184-6
Wang, F., Sun, J., Sun, P., Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2017). Influence of simple action on subsequent manual and ocular responses.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
79(2), 389–395.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1280-2
Zhang, H., & Houpt, J. W. (2020). Exaggerated prevalence effect with the explicit prevalence information:
The description-experience gap in visual search.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(7), 3340–3356.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02045-8
Zhao, F., & Ren, Y. (2020). Revisiting contextual cueing effects:
The role of perceptual processing.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
82(4), 1695–1709.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01962-7